My gear is a point-and-shoot that I routinely put on the end of a long stick and dunk into local creeks and ponds.Umm ... absolutely not, actually. Cleaning a precision optical surface is an extremely fraught process; one that is quite likely to make the problem worse rather than better. You're much better off maintaining your gear (proper use of lens caps, etc) in such a way that the "schmutz" never makes it to the surface in the first place.
"You" being a familiar, casual term for "most people, statistically," I think the statement is just fine. The context is clearly not "average people but in a clean suit, clean room yet somehow with a dirty scratchy rag." It's "if you had a mucky spot on the camera at hand, you'd likely wipe it off."Umm ... absolutely not, actually. Cleaning a precision optical surface is an extremely fraught process; one that is quite likely to make the problem worse rather than better. You're much better off maintaining your gear (proper use of lens caps, etc) in such a way that the "schmutz" never makes it to the surface in the first place.
We only have seven billion years to solve the problem!Sci-fi plot: a civilization emerges, they figure out that their star is trailing a black hole, then they figure out that theif black hole is heading for a really big black hole, the clock is ticking…..
No? Optical glass and coatings do need periodic cleaning. It's not fraught at all, it's quite routine, as the glass and coatings are very hard. Unless you use them in a clean room, your lenses will inevitably be exposed to moisture, dust, etc. and need cleaning.Umm ... absolutely not, actually. Cleaning a precision optical surface is an extremely fraught process; one that is quite likely to make the problem worse rather than better. You're much better off maintaining your gear (proper use of lens caps, etc) in such a way that the "schmutz" never makes it to the surface in the first place.
Still less holes than in the average movie plot.If the last hypothesis turns out to be correct, that is a whole lot of holes...
The reason I believe (Not An Astronomer) we don't see more tendrils may be due to the intergalactic gas turbulence.assuming this kind of thing has happened more than a few times in the past why don’t we see many intergalactic stars in sort of tendrils going out into the void? Presumably some of them would retain their rotational momentum from being the the galaxy. But damn a flinging super massive black hole going on a random path seems like the plot of the last season of Star Trek discoverywith the planet harvesting black-hole’ish device that the aliens are using for mining.
I mean you can even shoot large telescopes and they still function.No? Optical glass and coatings do need periodic cleaning. It's not fraught at all, it's quite routine, as the glass and coatings are very hard. Unless you use them in a clean room, your lenses will inevitably be exposed to moisture, dust, etc. and need cleaning.
I see what you did thereSo while god may not play dice, she appears to play billiards?
Once a sat next to an older couple on a plane, and the guy was complaining about such shmutz in his photos. Then he showed me his SLR (not D, this was decades ago) and how he'd gone in with a lens paper and cleaned the front-surface mirror there. At that point forget shmutz, you could see that he'd damaged the silvering.Umm ... absolutely not, actually. Cleaning a precision optical surface is an extremely fraught process; one that is quite likely to make the problem worse rather than better. You're much better off maintaining your gear (proper use of lens caps, etc) in such a way that the "schmutz" never makes it to the surface in the first place.
Cheesy puns on Ars? Shocking!The comments are slowly moving towards cheesy puns, just like Reddit. But it's ok, I needed a laugh today.
No whey!Cheesy puns on Ars? Shocking!
/s
When I used to play, hitting a jump shot so hard that the ball flew across the room got you thrown out of the pool hall. Whoever did this isn't a god, they're a very naughty boy.So while god may not play dice, she appears to play billiards?
Could be interesting, as, they try to calculate whether a merger will take place, how much energy will be (has been) released, and in what form.Sci-fi plot: a civilization emerges, they figure out that their star is trailing a black hole, then they figure out that theif black hole is heading for a really big black hole, the clock is ticking…..
Used to be possibly even more embarrassing back in the old days – one could happily shoot a full roll of film through a Leica and not realise they had the lens cap on ;-)[...] Using your lens cap so much that your lens never gets dirty means you're never taking a photo or otherwise imaging anything.
Still fewer holes than the Republican Party.Still less holes than in the average movie plot.
Only the Milky one.No whey!
Aren't there tonnes of dust and other space debris falling on earth every day? Surely some of that must get onto Hubble? How do they keep it clean and clear?Umm ... absolutely not, actually. Cleaning a precision optical surface is an extremely fraught process; one that is quite likely to make the problem worse rather than better. You're much better off maintaining your gear (proper use of lens caps, etc) in such a way that the "schmutz" never makes it to the surface in the first place.
Egan's Incandescence novel is about a civilisation developing in a splintered world's remnant, caught by and orbiting around a travelling black hole or a neutron star. And the merger they have to somehow survive is actually there, though "only" their "sun" breaking and gobbling up another star, all in the galactic core. Does that check most of the marks?Could be interesting, as, they try to calculate whether a merger will take place, how much energy will be (has been) released, and in what form.
Things are bad enough in galactic cores where the average distance between stars is only in the hundreds of AU's, only 10's of times the distance between planets. And each star on its own orbit, so stars passing through your solar system from time to time, scattering or exchanging planetary bodies.
That's Roger Wilco's thankless space janitor job.Aren't there tonnes of dust and other space debris falling on earth every day? Surely some of that must get onto Hubble? How do they keep it clean and clear?
As opposed to JWST’s exposed mirrors, Hubble’s mirrors are deep inside its metal cylinder body and I’m sure those in charge of its orientation are very careful to never point the cylinder’s opening in the direction it is traveling.Aren't there tonnes of dust and other space debris falling on earth every day? Surely some of that must get onto Hubble? How do they keep it clean and clear?